Apache Kafka vs. Redis Streams: Differences & Comparison

Overview

Redis Streams and Apache Kafka are two popular technologies for handling real-time data streaming and messaging. While they share some functional similarities, they differ significantly in architecture, performance characteristics, and ideal use cases. This comprehensive comparison examines their differences, implementation details, performance considerations, and best practices to help you make an informed decision for your streaming data needs.

Core Concepts and Architecture

Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is a distributed streaming platform designed specifically for high-throughput, low-latency data streaming. Developed initially by LinkedIn and later donated to the Apache Software Foundation, Kafka has become the industry standard for building real-time data pipelines and streaming applications.

Kafka's architecture consists of several key components:

Brokers : Servers that store data and serve client requests
Topics : Categories for organizing message streams
Partitions : Subdivisions of topics that enable parallel processing
Producers : Applications that publish messages to topics
Consumers : Applications that subscribe to topics to process data
Consumer Groups : Collections of consumers that work together to process messages

Kafka stores messages on disk by default, providing durability and persistence while still maintaining high throughput.

Redis Streams

Redis Streams is a data structure introduced in Redis 5.0 that acts as a log-like append-only data structure. As part of Redis, an in-memory data store, Redis Streams inherits its speed and simplicity while adding specific features for handling time-ordered data streams.

The core architecture of Redis Streams includes:

Stream Entries : Messages with unique IDs in the format timestamp-sequence
Field-Value Pairs : The data structure of each entry
Consumer Groups : Similar to Kafka, allows distributed processing
Pending Entries List (PEL) : Tracks entries delivered but not acknowledged

As part of Redis, Streams operates primarily in-memory with optional persistence, making it extremely fast but more constrained by available RAM compared to Kafka.

Key Differences

Performance Characteristics

Attribute	Redis Streams	Apache Kafka
Data Storage	In-memory with optional persistence	Disk-based with in-memory caching
Latency	Sub-millisecond (extremely low)	Low (but higher than Redis)
Throughput	High (limited by memory)	Very high (designed for high throughput)
Scalability	Limited by Redis clustering capabilities	High scalability with partitioning
Data Retention	Typically shorter term (hours to days)	Long-term storage capabilities (days to years)
Memory Efficiency	High	Memory used primarily for caching
Processing Model	Single-threaded event loop	Distributed processing

Messaging Workflow

Kafka Workflow :

Producers publish messages to brokers, which categorize data into topics and store in partitions
Consumers connect to relevant topics and extract data from corresponding partitions
Topics are divided across multiple brokers for scalability and fault tolerance

Redis Streams Workflow :

Uses a client-server architecture with keys and primary-secondary nodes
Producers use XADD to append entries to streams
Consumers use XREAD or XREADGROUP to retrieve messages
Supports consumer groups similar to Kafka, but with different implementation details

Use Cases: When to Choose Which

Choose Redis Streams When:

Processing less than 1TB of data per day
Seeking simplicity in deployment and operations
Message history needs are moderate (hours to days)
Already using Redis for other components
Sub-millisecond processing is required
Working with simpler streaming needs in a familiar Redis environment

Choose Kafka When:

Processing more than 1TB of data per day
Long-term storage (days to years) is needed
Requiring integration with Hadoop, Spark, or other big data tools
Advanced partition management is required
Cross-datacenter replication is essential
Building complex, large-scale data pipelines

Technical Implementation

Consumer Group Mechanisms

Both systems implement consumer groups, but with different approaches:

Kafka Consumer Groups :

Assign partitions to consumers statically
If a consumer fails, the group coordinator triggers a rebalance
Each partition is processed by exactly one consumer in a group

Redis Streams Consumer Groups :

Created with XGROUP CREATE command
Maintain a "Pending Entries List" (PEL) for tracking unacknowledged messages
Support runtime consumer handling - if one consumer fails, Redis continues serving others

bash

# Creating a consumer group in Redis
XGROUP CREATE mystream mygroup 0

# Reading from the stream using the consumer group
XREADGROUP GROUP mygroup consumer1 STREAMS mystream >

Data Persistence Models

Kafka :

Persists all data to disk by default
Uses a log-structured storage model with segment files
Retains messages for configurable periods (days to years)
Provides strong durability guarantees

Redis Streams :

Primarily in-memory with optional persistence
Persistence options include AOF (Append-Only File) and RDB (Redis Database)
Memory is the primary limiting factor
Can be configured with MAXLEN to automatically trim older entries

bash

# Writing to a Redis stream with a cap on its length
XADD mystream MAXLEN ~ 1000 * field value

Performance Optimization

Kafka Optimization Best Practices

Partition Optimization :
- Increase partitions for higher parallelism
- Balance between too few (limited parallelism) and too many (overhead)
- Consider the relationship between partitions and consumer groups
Producer Configuration :
- Adjust batch.size for throughput vs. latency tradeoff
- Configure linger.ms to allow batching for better throughput
- Use appropriate compression settings for your workload
Consumer Configuration :
- Set appropriate fetch.min.bytes and fetch.max.wait.ms
- Configure consumer max.poll.records based on processing capabilities
- Consider thread count and processing model

Redis Streams Optimization

Memory Management :
- Use XTRIM to limit stream length and prevent memory issues
- Use approximate trimming for efficiency with ~ symbol
- Configure stream-node-max-bytes to control per-node memory usage

plaintext

# Limit stream length to prevent memory issues
XTRIM mystream MAXLEN ~ 100000

Consumer Group Optimization :
- Process messages in batches (10-100 entries)
- Acknowledge messages in batches to reduce network round-trips
- Set appropriate timeouts for blocking operations
Monitoring Metrics :
- Track stream length and details with XINFO STREAM
- Monitor consumer group status with XINFO GROUPS
- Check individual consumer lag with XINFO CONSUMERS

Common Issues and Troubleshooting

Consumer Lag

Kafka :

Monitor consumer lag metrics using Kafka's monitoring tools
Scale consumer groups horizontally to improve processing throughput
Optimize consumer configurations and processing logic

Redis Streams :

Monitor pending entries list (PEL) for growing backlog
Add more consumer instances to scale processing
Enable batch acknowledgment using XACK with multiple IDs

Memory Pressure

Kafka :

Less susceptible to memory pressure due to disk-based storage
Monitor broker heap usage and GC patterns
Adjust JVM parameters as needed

Redis Streams :

Critical concern due to in-memory nature
Use auto-trimming with XTRIM to manage historical data
Monitor Redis memory usage via INFO memory command
Consider Redis cluster deployment for horizontal scaling

Message Loss

Kafka :

Configure appropriate replication factor (typically 3)
Set proper acks value for producers (usually all for critical data)
Implement idempotent producers for exactly-once semantics

Redis Streams :

Be aware of replication limitations - asynchronous replication doesn't guarantee all commands are replicated
Implement client retry mechanisms for critical messages
Enable AOF persistence as 'always' for improved durability

Scalability Approaches

Kafka Scalability

Kafka achieves horizontal scalability through:

Distributing partitions across brokers
Adding more brokers to a cluster to increase capacity
Allowing consumer groups to parallelize processing
Supporting cross-datacenter replication

Redis Streams Scalability

Redis Streams scaling options include:

Sharding streams across multiple Redis nodes
Using Redis Cluster for automatic partitioning
Implementing client-side sharding strategies
Leveraging consumer groups for parallel processing

python

# Example pseudo-code for sharding in Redis Streams
shard_id = hash_func(data) % num_of_shards
redis_clients[shard_id].xadd(stream_name, data)

Conclusion

Both Apache Kafka and Redis Streams offer powerful capabilities for handling streaming data, but they excel in different scenarios.

Kafka stands out for large-scale, distributed applications requiring long-term message retention, high durability, and extensive ecosystem integration. Its robust architecture makes it ideal for enterprise-grade applications with complex data pipelines and high-volume throughput requirements.

Redis Streams shines in scenarios requiring extreme low latency, simpler deployment, and when working within an existing Redis infrastructure. Its in-memory nature makes it exceptionally fast but more constrained by memory availability, making it better suited for scenarios with moderate data volumes and shorter retention needs.

The choice between these technologies should be guided by your specific requirements around data volume, retention needs, latency sensitivity, and existing infrastructure. For many organizations, they may even complement each other, with Redis Streams handling ultra-low-latency requirements while Kafka serves as the backbone for broader data streaming needs.

If you find this content helpful, you might also be interested in our product AutoMQ. AutoMQ is a cloud-native alternative to Kafka by decoupling durability to S3 and EBS. 10x Cost-Effective. No Cross-AZ Traffic Cost. Autoscale in seconds. Single-digit ms latency. AutoMQ now is source code available on github. Big Companies Worldwide are Using AutoMQ. Check the following case studies to learn more:

Apache Kafka vs. Redis Streams: Differences & Comparison

Overview

Core Concepts and Architecture

Apache Kafka

Redis Streams

Key Differences

Performance Characteristics

Messaging Workflow

Use Cases: When to Choose Which

Choose Redis Streams When:

Choose Kafka When:

Technical Implementation

Consumer Group Mechanisms

Data Persistence Models

Performance Optimization

Kafka Optimization Best Practices

Redis Streams Optimization

Common Issues and Troubleshooting

Consumer Lag

Memory Pressure

Message Loss

Scalability Approaches

Kafka Scalability

Redis Streams Scalability

Conclusion

Newsletter